We Need A New Interpretation of The Consitution

Posted: April 23, 2013 in Category - Constitutional Understanding, Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Need A New Interpretation of the Constitution

The following article shows the logical consequence of the ideology that states the Constitution is a living document to be addressed and interpreted by the general consensus of the day. Mayor Bloomberg, a wanna-be tin-pot dictator, has decided that America needs a new interpretation of the Constitution.

What is funny about Bloomberg’s reasoning is that we need a new interpretation to protect ourselves, America, from those who want to take away our freedoms. Yet, that is exactly what Bloomberg is advocating. To take away our Constitutional Rights for the sake of security. So, in reality who is the greater enemy? The one without? The one within?

Benjamin Franklin said, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Bloomberg is a perfect example.

Bloomberg: Interpretation of U.S. Constitution Will ‘Have to Change’ Following Boston Bombings

Posted by ilona trommler

by NTEB News Desk

Right now, with Obama occupying the White House the Liberals have the momentum. And with heavy-hitters like George Soros and Michael Bloomberg, they have the money. For all of us who love freedom and the United States Constitution this is a toxic combination.

As you will see in the story below, they believe their time is now and they will continue taking strike and strike against the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and everything else that this country is founded on. The scary part is that they just might be able to pull it off.

“…but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.” Luke 22:53

From Politicker: In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Monday the country’s interpretation of the Constitution will “have to change” to allow for greater security to stave off future attacks.

nyc-mayor-bloomberg-says-constitution-must-change-after-boston-bombings

“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry,” Mr. Bloomberg said during a press conference in Midtown. “But we live in a complex word where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

Mr. Bloomberg, who has come under fire for the N.Y.P.D.’s monitoring of Muslim communities and other aggressive tactics, said the rest of the country needs to learn from the attacks.

____________________________________________________

From Billy Hallowell @ the Blaze

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg believes that the Boston Marathon bombings have created a unique scenario — one in which traditional interpretations of the U.S. Constitution must change. Rather than shying away from cameras and other security mechanisms that some view as infringements upon individual privacy, the politician claims that the most recent attack calls for a new paradigm.

As for those who fear government intrusion and express serious concerns about how these technologies and other policies could impede privacy, Bloomberg is sympathetic — but only to a point.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg speaks at the Conde Nast Celebrates Editorial Excellence: Toast To Editors, Writers And Contributors on April 22, 2013 in New York City. Credit: Getty Images for Conde Nast

“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry, but we live in a complex world where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will,” Bloomberg said during a press conference on Monday. “And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

He went on to note that we live in a dangerous world and that there are some who wish to take away Americans’ freedoms, the Observer’s Politicker reports. But in order to protect these sentiments, Bloomberg argued that more intensive security is necessary.

“We have to understand that in the world going forward, we’re going to have more cameras and that kind of stuff. That’s good in some sense, but it’s different from what we are used to,” he continued.

As the Observer’s Politicker notes, Bloomberg also invoked gun control while making his point about the Constitution and security. In connecting what he said is the Supreme Court’s recognition that there are some interpretations of the Second Amendment that give way to “reasonable gun laws,” the mayor said that the nation will also need to “live with reasonable levels of security.”

Mayor Michael Bloomberg attends The Through The Kitchen Party Benefit For Cancer Research Institute on April 21, 2013 in New York City. Credit: Getty Images for Cancer Research

Bloomberg went on to argue that the Boston attack should not be used to go after specific religious groups. And he heralded the importance of striking a balance between enjoying personal freedom and ensuring security.

“What we cant do is let the protection get in the way of us enjoying our freedoms. You still want to let people practice their religion, no matter what that religion is,” he said. “And I think one of the great dangers here is going and categorizing anybody from one religion as a terrorist. That’s not true…That would let the terrorists win. That’s what they want us to do.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s